<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>InfoZone &#187; photos</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.addhen.org/blog/tag/photos/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.addhen.org/blog</link>
	<description>Hiking On The Web For Technology</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 25 Apr 2010 12:43:41 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Why Flickr Not Picasaweb</title>
		<link>http://www.addhen.org/blog/2008/12/26/why-flickr-not-picasaweb/</link>
		<comments>http://www.addhen.org/blog/2008/12/26/why-flickr-not-picasaweb/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Dec 2008 01:53:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Henry Addo</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[non-categorize]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[flickr]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[photo sharing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[photos]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[picasaweb]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.addhen.org/blog/?p=84</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Not Picasaweb is a photo sharing service provided by Google with so many features, like tagging, unlimited albums, photo manager, location tagging, commenting, public API, just to mention a few. Flickr on the other hand is also a photo sharing service provided by Yahoo. It has similar features just like Picasaweb, just that, it&#8217;s free [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="mceTemp mceIEcenter">
<dl class="wp-caption aligncenter" style="width: 400px;">
<dt class="wp-caption-dt"><img title="Flickr" src="http://img.skitch.com/20081226-nstq985wjedwpgggjycqb8479u.jpg" alt="" width="390" height="204" /></dt>
</dl>
</div>
<p style="text-align: center;"><strong>Not</strong></p>
<div class="mceTemp mceIEcenter">
<dl class="wp-caption aligncenter" style="width: 400px;">
<dt class="wp-caption-dt"><img title="Picasaweb" src="http://img.skitch.com/20081226-4bm94akqkd5diif3e3bn2fd14.jpg" alt="Picasaweb" width="390" height="180" /></dt>
</dl>
</div>
<p><a title="Picasaweb" href="http://picasaweb.google.com" class="aptureAutolink">Picasaweb</a> is a photo sharing service provided by Google with so many features, like tagging, unlimited albums, photo manager, location tagging, commenting, <a title="Public API" href="http://code.google.com/apis/picasaweb/overview.html" class="aptureAutolink">public API</a>, just to mention a few. <a title="Flickr" href="http://www.flickr.com" class="aptureAutolink">Flickr</a> on the other hand is also a photo sharing service provided by Yahoo. It has similar features just like Picasaweb, just that, it&#8217;s free account is not friendly like that of Picasaweb that offers unlimited albums and upload times with upgradable space of 1GB. Flickr&#8217;s free account restricts to showing only the most recent 200 photos, it is limited to only 3 sets ( its called album in Picasaweb lingo ), uploads are limited to 100MB per mont and other unfriendly nature of it.</p>
<p>With all these friendliness Picasaweb provide, I wonder why people tend to you use Flickr more than Picasaweb especially when it comes to free account of both services.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m asking a little favour from my readers, why do you use Flickr over Picasaweb, share by posting a comment.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.addhen.org/blog/2008/12/26/why-flickr-not-picasaweb/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
